Argumenta – Journal of Analytic Philosophy

Levin Güver in Issue 18

The Unity of Motive [Lex Academic Prize]

Epistemology, Moral Philosophy, Philosophy of action, Theoretical philosophy

The role of intention in criminal law stands in stark contrast to that of motive. While intention’s significance for criminal liability is hardly ever contested, motive’s relevance is most frequently relegated to the peripheries. This is, I believe, a mistake, and I hope to amend it by providing a novel argument in favour of motive’s relevance to criminal liability: an argument premised not on normative considerations, but on the very…

Peter Ludlow in Issue 18

Non-Persistent Truths and Alethic Charity [Critical Note]

Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of language, Theoretical philosophy

In his fascinating paper on non-persistent truths, Andrea Bonomi makes the case that the truth value of propositions may shift over time, and he takes issue with Gareth Evans’ criticism of such a view. Some of the linguistic evidence provided by Bonomi may strike philosophers as suspect, but I build a case for the legitimacy of such evidence under a principle that I call “alethic charity,” which governs folk truth…

Ernesto Napoli in Issue 18

Non-Persistent Truths? [Critical Note]

Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophical logic, Philosophy of language, Theoretical philosophy

I argue that the semantic route to the revisability of the future indicated by Bonomi disappoints the expectations. Bonomi makes a lot of a confessed peculiar use of ‘no longer’. The use is indeed peculiar, not to say out of the question. Any statement of “The F is no longer G” is about a change in a subject. Bonomi sets up a scenario in which there is a change of…

Francesco Orilia in Issue 18

Floating, Anchored and Future-Tensed Propositions [Critical Note]

Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophical logic, Philosophy of language, Theoretical philosophy

There are two prominent theses in Bonomi’s 2023 paper “Non-Persistent Truths”, here labelled the two-levels and the changing background theses. According to the former, both semantic eternalism and temporalism are right, in that our ordinary natural language utterances may be taken to express both anchored propositions with a fixed truth value and floating propositions with a changing truth value. According to the changing background thesis, there are future-tensed propositions that…

Carlo Penco in Issue 18

Between Gareth Evans and Bill Evans: Andrea Bonomi’s Multi-Propositionalism [Critical Note]

Metaphysics, Philosophical logic, Philosophy of language, Philosophy of Time, Theoretical philosophy

Evans claims that a sentence should always be considered correct or incorrect at the time of its utterance, to preserve what is called the “stability principle”. To introduce the debate, I refer to some remarks by Kamangar and Perry, who show how Frege could have treated future contingents in a way that would contrast Evans’ claim. I then discuss the more traditional contrast between Frege and Prior on different conceptions…

Alfredo Tomasetta in Issue 18

Analytic Phenomenology: A Guided Tour [Special Issue]

Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of mind, Theoretical philosophy

A turn is taking place in analytic philosophy of mind. This article attempts to flesh out this claim by providing an overview of what may be called ‘analytic phenomenology’. The first section gives some reasons why this overview may be useful. The overview itself takes up the second section, which is divided into five sub-sections that address some of the central themes of analytic phenomenology. The third section draws a…

Elisabetta Sacchi in Issue 18

Is Psychologism Unavoidable in a Phenomenologically Adequate Account of Mental Content? [Special Issue]

Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of language, Philosophy of mind, Theoretical philosophy

In my paper I focus on psychologism in the theory of mental content and critically consider a variety of it—“intentional psychologism” (Pitt 2009)—that has recently entered the stage in the philosophy of mind literature. My aim is twofold. First, I want to provide a critical evaluation of this new variety of psychologism, considering in particular whether it is immune from (some of) the most famous classical criticisms. Secondly, I want…

David Bourget, Angela Mendelovici in Issue 18

Is Intentionality a Relation? A Dialogue [Special Issue]

Cognitive science, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of language, Philosophy of mind, Theoretical philosophy

This dialogue explores the question of whether intentionality––the “ofness”, “aboutness”, or “directedness” of mental states––is a relation. We explore three views: the Naive View, on which intentionality is a relation to ordinary, everyday objects, facts, and other such items; the Abstract Contents View, on which intentionality is a relation to mind-independent abstract entities; and the Aspect View, on which intentionality is a matter of having intentional states with particular (non-relational)…

Christopher Stratman in Issue 18

Analytic Phenomenology and the Inseparatism Thesis [Special Issue]

Cognitive science, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of mind, Theoretical philosophy

A phenomenological turn has occurred in contemporary philosophy of mind. Some philosophers working on the nature of intentionality and consciousness have turned away from views that construe the basic ingredients of intentionality in terms of naturalistic tracking relations that hold between thinkers and external conditions in their environment in favor of what has been called the “Phenomenal Intentionality Theory” (PIT). According to PIT, all “original” intentionality is either identical to…