Argumenta – Journal of Analytic Philosophy

 

Moral Conflict Resolution and Normative Adjustment

Issue: • Author/s: Federico Bina
Topics: Ethics, Metaethics, Metaphysics, Moral Philosophy, Philosophy of action, Theoretical philosophy

In this paper, I show how a pragmatist stance may address the problem of the resolvability of moral conflicts. Pragmatism challenges skeptical and relativist views by arguing that moral conflict resolution is possible via inquiry and exchange of reasons. From a normative standpoint, pragmatism also differs from utilitarian and deontological views, according to which a specific moral theory is correct in every context. From a pragmatist point of view, both utilitarian and deontological responses can be justified, depending on contextual conditions and reasons, on the people to whom reasons are…